Over an extended period, threatening phone calls persisted. Originally, supposedly from a former police officer and a retired army general, later from the authorities. Finally, a local artisan asserts he was called to law enforcement headquarters and told clearly: stop speaking out or experience severe repercussions.
The leather artisan is one of many opposing a multimillion-dollar initiative where Dharavi – an iconic Mumbai neighborhood – faces demolished and transformed by a large business group.
"The unique ecosystem of the slum is exceptional in the globe," states the protester. "Yet they want to eradicate our community and prevent our protests."
The narrow alleys of the slum stand in sharp opposition to the soaring skyscrapers and Bollywood penthouses that dominate the settlement. Homes are assembled randomly and frequently missing basic amenities, unregulated industries produce dangerous fumes and the atmosphere is saturated with the suffocating smell of exposed drainage.
Among some individuals, the promise of the slum's redevelopment into a modern district of high-end towers, well-maintained green spaces, contemporary malls and homes with two toilets is a hopeful vision come true.
"We don't have adequate medical facilities, roads or drainage and there are no spaces for children to play," explains A Selvin Nadar, fifty-six, who migrated from his home state in that period. "The only way is to clear the area and build us new homes."
Yet certain residents, including Shaikh, are opposing the project.
Everyone acknowledges that this community, long neglected as unauthorized settlement, is urgently needing investment and development. But they are concerned that this plan – without resident participation – could potentially convert premium city property into a playground for the rich, forcing out the lower-caste, immigrant populations who have resided there since generations ago.
This involved these excluded, displaced people who built up the empty marshland into an extensively researched phenomenon of local enterprise and economic productivity, whose output is worth between a significant amount and two million dollars per year, making it among the globe's biggest unofficial markets.
Among approximately one million residents living in the dense 220-hectare neighborhood, less than 50% will be eligible for replacement housing in the project, which is estimated to take an extended timeframe to complete. The remainder will be relocated to wastelands and coastal regions on the far outskirts of the metropolis, risking break up a historic community. Some will receive no housing at all.
Those allowed to remain in the neighborhood will be allocated apartments in multi-story structures, a significant rupture from the organic, collective approach of living and working that has supported this area for so long.
Commercial activities from tailoring to ceramic crafts and material recovery are likely to reduce in scale and be moved to an allocated "commercial zone" far from residential areas.
In the case of the leather artisan, a workshop owner and third generation of his family to call home this community, the plan presents an existential threat. His informal, multi-level operation produces leather coats – formal jackets, suede trenches, fashionable garments – sold in high-end shops in upscale neighborhoods and internationally.
Relatives lives in the rooms downstairs and his workers and tailors – migrants from north India – also sleep in the same building, allowing him to sustain operations. Away from Dharavi's enclave, accommodation prices are typically significantly costlier for basic accommodation.
In the official facilities close by, a visual representation of the transformation initiative depicts an alternative perspective. Slickly dressed inhabitants move around on two-wheelers and e-vehicles, purchasing western-style baked goods and croissants and socializing on an outdoor area outside a restaurant and dessert parlor. This depicts a world away from the affordable idli sambar first meal and budget beverage that sustains local residents.
"This represents no improvement for our community," says the artisan. "This constitutes a massive property transaction that will render it impossible for our community to continue."
Furthermore, there's distrust of the development company. Managed by a powerful tycoon – among the country's wealthiest and an associate of the Indian prime minister – the business group has faced accusations of preferential treatment and questionable practices, which it disputes.
Even as the state government calls it a collaborative effort, the developer invested nearly a billion dollars for its controlling interest. A lawsuit stating that the project was unfairly awarded to the corporation is pending in the top court.
After they started to vocally oppose the development, protesters and community members claim they have been subjected to a long-running campaign of pressure and threats – comprising phone calls, explicit warnings and implications that criticizing the development was equivalent to anti-national sentiment – by figures they claim represent the business conglomerate.
Included in these accused of issuing the threats is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c